Contact

Dr. Leif Johannsen
E-Mail: leif.johannsen@psych.rwth-aachen.de
 
 

 

 funded by

DFG Logo

Uni-Logo
Sie sind hier: Startseite Publications
Artikelaktionen

Publications

*in press*

Brüning, J., Koob, V., Manzey, D., & Janczyk, M. (in press). Serial and parallel processing in multitasking: Concepts and the impact of inter-individual differences on task and stage levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

Brahms, M., Heinzel, S., Rapp, M., Reisner, V., Wahmkow,G., Rimpel, J., Schauenburg, G., Stelzel, C*., & Granacher, U*. (in press). Cognitive-Postural Multitasking Training in Older Adults – Effects of Input- Output Modality Mappings on Cognitive Performance and Postural Control. Journal of Cognition, https://doi.org/10.5334/ joc.146  *shared senior authorship

Jurczyk, V., Steinhauser, R., Dreisbach, G., & Steinhauser, M. (in press). To switch or to repeat? - Commonalities and differences in the electrophysiological correlates of preparation for voluntary and forced task choices. Psychophysiology.

Langhanns, C*., Monno, I*., Maurer, H. Ebel, J., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (in press). The Self-Organized Task Switching Paradigm – Movement effort matters. Acta Psychologica. (* = equal author contribution)

Monno, I., Aufschnaiter, S., Ehret, S., Kiesel, A., Poljac, E.,& Thomaschke, R. (in press). Time-based Task Expectancy: Perceptual Task Indicator Expectancy or Expectancy of Postperceptual Task Components? Psychological Research.

Naefgen, C. & Gaschler, R. (in press) Trade-off vs. common factor – differentiating resource-based explanations from their alternative. Frontiers in Psychology.

Reinert, R. & Brüning, J. (in press). Individual strategies of response organization in multitasking are stable even at risk of high between-task interference. Frontiers in Psychology.

Schaaf, M., Kunde, W., & Wirth, R. (in press). Evidence for initially independent monitoring of responses and response effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

Straub, E. R., Dames, H., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (in press). Does body posture reduce the Stroop effect? Evidence from two conceptual replications and a meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica.

Spitzer, M., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (in press). Performance Errors Influence Voluntary Task Choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

 

*2022*

Broeker, L., Brüning, J., Fandakova, Y., Khosravani, N., Kiesel, A., Kubik, V., Kübler, S., Manzey, D., Monno, I., Raab, M., Schubert, T. (2022). Individual differences fill the uncharted intersections between cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in multitasking. Psychol Rev, in press.

Broeker, L., Johnson, J. G., Oliveira, R. F. de, Ewolds, H. E., Künzell, S. & Raab, M. (2022). Switch rates vary due to expected payoff but not due to individual risk tendency. Acta Psychologica, 224, 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103521

Friedgen, E., Koch, I., & Stephan, D. N. (2022). Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4 https://rdcu.be/cGbWm

Kübler, S., Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2022). On the organization of task-order and task-specific information in dual-task situations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(1), 94–113.

Panzer, S., Pfeifer, C., Leinen, P. & Shea, C. (2022). Dyad Training in a Perceptual-Motor Task:"Two Pairs of Eyes Are Better Than One". Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 1(aop), 1-12.

Pelzer, L., Haffmann, J., Naefgen, C., Gaschler, R., & Haider, H. (2022). Task-separation in dual-tasking: How action effects support the separation of the task streams. Acta Psychologica, 222, 103464, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103464

Pfeifer, C., Panzer, S., & Shea, C. H. (2022). Attentional Demand of a Movement Sequence Guided by Visual-Spatial and by Motor Representations. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1-10.

Pfeifer, C., Shea, C. & Panzer, S. (2022). Does Dual-Task Practice Influence the Temporal Change of Attentional Demands of Sequence Representation? Journal of Sport Psychology & Exercise, 44, S49.

Wechsler, K., Bock, O., Schubert, T., Koch, I. (2022). Dual-task interference in simulated car driving: The psychological refractory period effect, when not only the second, but also the first is ecologically relevant. Applied Ergonomics Volume 102, July 2022, 103722

Wollesen, B., Janssen, T.I., Müller, H., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2022). Effects of cognitive-motor dual task training on cognitive and physical performance in healthy children and adolescents: A scoping review. Acta Psychologica, 224, 103498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103498
 

*2021*

Aufschnaiter, S., Kiesel, A., & Thomaschke, R. (2021). Time-based transition expectancy in task switching: Do we need to know the task to switch to? Journal of Cognition, 4, 1-14.

Aufschnaiter, S., Zhao, F., Gaschler, R., Kiesel, A., & Thomaschke, R. (2021). Investigating time-based expectancy beyond binary timing scenarios: evidence from a paradigm employing three predictive pre-target intervals. Psychological Research. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01606-2

Bock, O., Stojan, R., Wechsler, K., Mack, M., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2021). Distracting tasks have persisting effects on young and older drivers’ braking performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 161, 106363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106363

Bock, O., Wechsler, K., Koch, I. & Schubert, T. (2021). Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: Impact of first-task characteristics on the Psychological Refractory Period effect. Psychological Research, 85, 568-576. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01272-5

Brahms, C.M., Heinzel, S., Rapp, M., Reisner, V., Rimpel, J., Wahmkow, G., Stelzel, C., & Granacher, U. (2021). Cognitive-postural multitasking training in older adults – Effects of input-output modality mappings on cognitive performance and postural control. Journal of Cognition, 4(1).

Brahms, C. M., Hortobágyi, T., Kressig, R.W., & Granacher, U. (2021). The Interaction between Mobility Status and Exercise Specificity in Older Adults. Exercise and sport sciences reviews, 49(1), 15-22.

Broeker, L., Ewolds, H., Oliveira, R. F. de, Künzell, S., & Raab, M. (2021). The impact of predictability on dual-task performance and implications for resource-sharing accounts. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00267-w

Chaabene, H., Prieske, O., Herz, M., Moran, J., Höhne, J., Kliegl, R., ... & Granacher, U. (2021). Home-based exercise programmes improve physical fitness of healthy older adults: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis with relevance for COVID-19. Ageing Research Reviews, 101265.

Dignath, D., Kiesel, A., Schiltenwolf, M., & Hazeltine, E. (2021). Multiple Routes to Control in the Prime-Target Task: Congruence Sequence Effects Emerge Due to Modulation of Irrelevant Prime Activity and Utilization of Temporal Order Information. Journal of Cognition, 4(1): 18, 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.143

Ewolds, H., Broeker, L., Oliveira, R. F. de, Raab, M., & Künzell, S. (2021). Ways to Improve Multitasking: Effects of Predictability after Single- and Dual-Task Training. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.142

Forano, M., Schween, R., Taylor, J.A., Hegele, M., & Franklin, D. (2021). Direct and indirect cues can enable dual adaptation, but through different learning processes. Journal of Neurophysiology, 126, 1490-1506.

Friedgen, E., Koch, I., & Stephan, D. N. (2021). Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands. Psychological Research, 85, 2346-2363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01412-2

Grießbach, E., Incagli, F., Herbort, O. & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2021). Body dynamics of gait affect value-based decisions. Scientific Reports, 11, 11894.

Johannsen, L., Müller, H., Kiesel, A., & Koch, I. (2021). The State-of-the-art of research into human multitasking: An editorial. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 54. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.185

Koob, V., Ulrich, R., & Janczyk, M. (2021). Response activation and activation–transmission in response-based backward crosstalk: Analyses and simulations with an extended diffusion model. Psychological Review.  https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000326

Kübler, S., Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2021). The role of working memory for task-order coordination in dual-task situations. Psychological Research, 1-22.

Langhanns, C., Monno, I., Maurer, H., Ebel, J., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2021). The self-organized task switching paradigm: Movement effort matters. Acta Psychologica, 221. doi 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103446

Langsdorf, L., Maresch, J., & Hegele, M., McDougle, S. D., & Schween, R. (2021). Prolonged response time helps eliminate residual errors in visuomotor adaptation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 834-844. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01865-x

Ludwig, J., Dignath, D., & Lukas, S. (2021). Positive and negative action-effects improve task-switching performance. Acta psychologica, 221, 103440.

Mahesan, D., Janczyk, M.. & Fischer, R. (2021).Two types of between-task conflict trigger respective processing adjustments within one dual-task. Acta Psychologica, 103450, 1-11.

Mittelstädt, V., Schaffernak, I., Miller, J., & Kiesel, A. (2021). Balancing cognitive and environmental constraints when deciding to switch tasks: Exploring self-reported task-selection strategies in self-organized multitasking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74 (4), 598–609.

Monno, I., Spitzer, M., Miller, J., Dignath, D., & Kiesel, A. (2021). Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self-Organized Task Switching. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 8.

Moretti, L., Koch, I., Steinhauser, M., & Schuch, S. (2021). Errors in task switching: Investigating error aftereffects in a N-2 repetition cost paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001034.

Panzer, S., Kennedy, D., Leinen, P., Pfeifer, C., & Shea, C. (2021). Bimanual coordination associated with left-and right-hand dominance: testing the limb assignment and limb dominance hypothesis. Experimental Brain Research, 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06082-z

Panzer, S. Pfeifer, C. Harenz, J. Bock, O. Shea, C.H. (2021). Inter-Individual Differences in the Capability to Reduce Dual-Task Interference in Sequence Learning. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology Supplement, 43, 41.

Pelzer, L., Naefgen, C., Gaschler, R., Haider, H. (2021). Learning of across- and within-task contingencies modulates partial-repetition costs in dual-tasking. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01518-1

Pfeifer, C., Harenz, J., Shea, C. H., Panzer, S. (2021). Movement Sequence Learning: Cognitive Processing Demands to Develop a Response Structure. Journal of Cognition, 4(1): 12, pp. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.128

Pfeifer, C. Shea, C.H. Bock, O. Haeger, M. Panzer, S. (2021). The Role of Executive Functions: Single-Task vs. Dual-Task Training in Learning a Simple Movement Sequence. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology Supplement, 43, 42.

Raßbach, P., Grießbach, E., Cañal-Bruland, R. & Herbort, O. (2021). Deciding while moving: Cognitive interference biases value-based decisions. Acta Psychologica, 221, 103449.

Rieger, T., Mittelstädt, V., Dignath, D., & Kiesel, A. (2021). Investigating Limits of Task Prioritization in Dual-Tasking: Evidence from the Prioritized Processing and the Psychological Refractory Period Paradigms. Psychological Research, 85(1), 384-396. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01250-x

Schuch, S.*, & Dignath, D.* (2021). Task conflict biases decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150, 864–872. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000908 (*shared first authorship)

Schuch, S., Philipp, A., Maulitz, L., & Koch, I. (2021). On the reliability of behavioral measures of cognitive control: Retest reliability of task-inhibition effect, task-preparation effect, Stroop-like interference, and conflict adaptation effect. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01627-x
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00426-021-01627-x.pdf

Schuch, S., & Pütz, S. (2021). Mood state and conflict adaptation: An update and a diffusion model analysis. Psychological Research, 85, 322–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01258-3

Schwarze, S. A., Poppa, C., Gawronska, S. M., & Fandakova, Y. (2021). The more, the merrier? What happens in your brain when you are multitasking? Frontiers for Young Minds, 9, Article 584481. https://doi.org/10.3389/frym.2021.584481

Steinhauser, R., Kübler, S., Steinhauser, M., & Schubert, T. (2021). Neural correlates of task-order preparation in dual tasks: an EEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33, 2181-2196.

Steinhauser, R., & Steinhauser, M. (2021). Adaptive rescheduling of error monitoring during multitasking. NeuroImage, 232, 117888.

Stephan, D. N., Fintor, E., & Koch, I. (2021). Short-term pre-exposure to modality mappings: Modality incompatible single-task exposure reduces modality-specific between-task crosstalk in task-switching. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Stephan, D. N., Josten, J., Friedgen, E., & Koch, I. (2021). Crossmodal effects in task switching: Modality compatibility with vocal and pedal responses. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 9. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.129

Stojan, R., Kaushal, N., Bock, O., Hudl, N., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2021). Benefits of higher cardiovascular and motor coordinative fitness on driving behavior are mediated by cognitive functioning: a path analysis. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.68649

Straub, E. R., Schmidts, C., Kunde, W., Zhang, J., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2021). Limitations of cognitive control on emotional distraction–Congruency in the Color Stroop task does not modulate the Emotional Stroop effect. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1-21.

Strobach, T., Kübler, S., & Schubert, T. (2021). A Gratton-like effect concerning task order in dual-task situations. Acta Psychologica, 217, 103328.

Röttger, E., Zhao, F., Gaschler, R., Haider, H. (2021). Why does dual-tasking hamper implicit sequence learning? Journal of Cognition , 4(1), 1–22. doi: 10.5334/joc.136

 

*2020*

Aufschnaiter, S., Kiesel, A., & Thomaschke, R. (2020). Humans derive task expectancies from sub-second and supra-second interval durations. Psychological Research, 84, 1333-1345.

Berger, A., Mitschke, V., Dignath, D., Eder, A., & van Steenbergen, H. (2020). The face of control: Corrugator supercilii tracks aversive conflict signals in the service of adaptive cognitive control. Psychophysiology, 57(4), e13524.

Broeker, L., Ewolds, H., Oliveira, R. F. de, Künzell, S. & Raab, M. (2020). Additive Effects of Prior Knowledge and Predictive Visual Information in Improving Continuous Tracking Performance. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), Artikel 40. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.130

Broeker, L., Haeger, M., Bock, O., Kretschmann, B., Ewolds, H., Künzell, S. & Raab, M. (2020). How visual information influences dual-task driving and tracking. Experimental brain research, 238(3), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05744-8

Brüning, J., Mückstein, M., & Manzey, D.  (2020). Multitasking strategies make the difference: Separating  processing-code resources boosts multitasking efficiency when  individuals prefer to interleave tasks in free concurrent dual tasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(12), 1411–1433. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000865

Brüning, J., Reissland, J. & Manzey, D. (2020). Individual  preferences for task coordination strategies in multitasking: exploring  the link between preferred modes of processing and strategies of  response organization, Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01291-7

Dignath, D., Eder, A. B., Steinhauser, M., & Kiesel, A. (2020).  Conflict monitoring and the affective signaling hypothesis - an integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 193-216.

Declerck, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2020). Evidence for conflict adaptation during bilingual language production with the n-3 effect. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24, 211-214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000292

Ewolds, H., Broeker, L., Oliveira, R. F. de, Raab, M. & Künzell, S. (2020). No impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning. Memory & Cognition. Vorab-Onlinepublikation. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01094-6

Fandakova, Y., & Hartley, C. A. (2020). Mechanisms of learning and plasticity in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 42, Article 100764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100764

Fintor, E., Poljac, E., Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2020). Modality compatibility biases voluntary choice of response modality in task switching. Psychological Research, 84, 380-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1040-5

Friedgen, E., Koch, I., & Stephan, D. N. (2020). Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands. Psychological Research: 1-18.

Hölle, D.,  Aufschnaiter, S., Bogon, J.,  Pfeuffer, C., Kiesel, A., & Thomaschke, R. (2020). Quality ratings of wine bottles in E-commerce: The influence of time delays and spatial arrangement. Journal of Wine Research, 31, 152-170.

Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2020). Dual tasking from a goal perspective. Psychological Review, 127, 1079-1096.

Koob, V., Durst, M., Bratzke, D., Ulrich, R., & Janczyk, M. (2020). S1-R2 and R1-R2 backward crosstalk both affect the central processing stage. Journal of Cognition, 3(1). http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.121

Langhanns, C. and Müller, H. (2020). Prescheduled interleaving of processing reduces interference in motor-cognitive dual tasks. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 33. doi 10.5334/joc.122

Laube, C., van den Bos, W., & Fandakova, Y. (2020). The relationship between pubertal hormones and brain plasticity: Implications for cognitive training in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 42, Article 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100753

Mattes, A., Tavera, F., Ophey, A., Roheger, M., Gaschler, R., & Haider, H. (2020). Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP-Paradigm: A drift diffusion model approach. Psychological Research. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01337-w

Panzer, S. Pfeifer, C., & Shea, C.H. (2020). Learning of 1:2 and 2:1 bimanual coordination patterns: Proactive effects on learning. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.

Pfeifer, C. Shea, C. H. & Panzer, S. (2020). A Dual-Task Degrades Response Execution Based on a Visual-Spatial Movement Sequence Representation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 42, 51-52.

Pfeuffer, C.U., Aufschnaiter, S., Thomaschke, R., & Kiesel, A. (2020). Only time will tell the Future: Anticipatory saccades reveal the temporal dynamics of time-based location and task expectancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46, 1183-1200.

Schonard, C., Ulrich, R., & Janczyk, M. (2020). The Backward Crosstalk Effect does not depend on the degree of a preceding response conflict. Experimental Psychology, 67, 277–291.

Schuch, S., Bock, O., Freitag, K., & Moretti, L. (2020). Cognitive Multitasking: Inhibition in Task Switching Depends on Stimulus Complexity. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.115

Schween, R., McDougle, S.D., Hegele, M. & Taylor, J.A. (2020). Assessing explicit strategies in force field adaptation. J Neurophysiol 123(4): 1552-65. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00427.2019

Stojan, R. & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2020). Neurophysiological correlates of age differences in driving behavior during concurrent subtask performance. NeuroImage, 225; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117492

Stute, K., Hudl, N., Stojan, R., Voelcker-Rehage C. (2020). Shedding Light on the Effects of Moderate Acute Exercise on Working Memory Performance in Healthy Older Adults: An fNIRS Study. Brain Sci, 10(11):813. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10110813. PMID: 33153013; PMCID: PMC7693615.

Wirth, R., Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2020). Localizing modality compatibility effects: Evidence from dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(12), 1527–1537.

Wirth, R., & Kunde, W. (2020). Feature binding contributions to effect monitoring. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(6), 3144-3157.

Zhao, F., Gaschler, R., Kneschke, A., Radler, S., Gausmann, M., Duttine, C., & Haider, H. (2020). Origami folding: Taxing resources necessary for the acquisition of sequential skills. PLoS ONE, 15(10), e0240226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240226

Zhao, F., Gaschler, R., Nöhring, D.O., Röttger, E., Haider, H. (2020). Sequential modulation of across-task congruency in the serial reaction time task. Acta Psychologica, 205, 205, 103043. doi: j.actpsy.2020.103043

 

*2019*

Aufschnaiter, S., Kiesel, A., & Thomaschke, R. (2019). Humans derive task expectancies from sub-second and supra-second interval durations. Psychol Res. doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01155-9

Bock, O., Haeger, M., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2019). Structure of executive functions in young and in older persons. PLoS One, 14(5), e0216149. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216149

Bohle, H., Rimpel, J., Schauenburg, G., Gebel, A., Stelzel, C., Heinzel, S., . . . Granacher, U. (2019). Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Cognitive-Motor Interference during Multitasking in Young and Old Adults. Neural Plast, 2019, 9478656. doi:10.1155/2019/9478656

Dignath, D., Berger, A., Spruit, I. M., & van Steenbergen, H. (2019). Temporal dynamics of error-related corrugator supercilii and zygomaticus major activity: Evidence for implicit emotion regulation following errors. Int J Psychophysiol, 146, 208-216. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.10.003

Dignath, D., Eder, A., Steinhauser, M., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Conflict Monitoring and the Affective Signaling Hypothesis -an Integrative Review. Psychon Bull Rev.

Dignath, D., Wirth, R., Kühnhausen, J., Gawrilow, C., Kunde, W., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Motivation drives conflict adaptation. Motivation Science. doi:10.1037/mot0000136

Durst, M., & Janczyk, M. (2019). Two types of Backward Crosstalk: Sequential modulations and evidence from the diffusion model. Acta Psychologica, 193, 132-152.

Durst, M., Ulrich, R., & Janczyk, M. (2019). To prepare or not to prepare? When preparation of a response in Task 2 induces extra performance costs in Task 1. Psychon Bull Rev, 26(2), 654-660. doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01581-1

Fintor, E., Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2019). The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 955-965. doi: 10.1177/1747021818771836

Frober, K., Pfister, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2019). Increasing reward prospect promotes cognitive flexibility: Direct evidence from voluntary task switching with double registration. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove), 72(8), 1926-1944. doi:10.1177/1747021818819449

Gaschler, R., Zhao, F., Röttger, E., Panzer, S., & Haider, H. (2019). More Than Hitting the Correct Key Quickly. Exp Psychol, 66(3), 207-220. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000446

Göhringer, F., Löhr-Limpens, M., Hesse, C., & Schenk, T. (2019). Grasping discriminates between object sizes less not more accurately than the perceptual system. Vision. doi:DOI 10.3390/vision3030036

Kübler, S., Soutschek, A., & Schubert, T. (2019). The causal role of the lateral prefrontal cortex for task-order coordination in dual-task situations: A study with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 31(12), 1840-1856.

Lohr-Limpens, M., Gohringer, F., Schenk, T., & Hesse, C. (2019). Grasping and perception are both affected by irrelevant information and secondary tasks: new evidence from the Garner paradigm. Psychol Res. doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01151-z

Mittelstadt, V., Miller, J., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Linking task selection to task performance: Internal and predictable external processing constraints jointly influence voluntary task switching behavior. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. doi:10.1037/xhp0000690

Panzer, S., Haab, T., Massing, M., Pfeifer, C., & Shea, C. H. (2019). Dyad training protocols and the development of a motor sequence representation. Acta Psychol (Amst), 201, 102947. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102947

Rieger, T., Mittelstadt, V., Dignath, D., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Investigating limits of task prioritization in dual-tasking: evidence from the prioritized processing and the psychological refractory period paradigms. Psychol Res. doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01250-x

Röttger, E., Haider, H., Zhao, F., & Gaschler, R. (2019). Implicit sequence learning despite multitasking: the role of across-task predictability. Psychol Res, 83(3), 526-543. doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0920-4

Schuch, S., Dignath, D., Steinhauser, M., & Janczyk, M. (2019). Monitoring and control in multitasking. Psychon Bull Rev, 26(1), 222-240. doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1512-z

Schuch, S. & Grange, J.A. (2019). Increased cognitive control after task conflict? Investigating the N-3 effect in task switching. Psychological Research, 83, 1703–1721. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1025-4

Schween, R., Langsdorf, L., Taylor, J.A.  & Hegele, M. (2019). How different effectors and action effects modulate the formation of separate motor memories. Sci Rep 9, 17040 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53543-1

Stojan, R. & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2019). A Systematic Review on the Cognitive Benefits and Neurophysiological Correlates of Exergaming in Healthy Older Adults. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(5), 734; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050734

Straub, E., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2019). Cognitive control of emotional distraction - valence-specific or general? Cogn Emot, 1-15. doi:10.1080/02699931.2019.1666799

Strobach, T., Kübler, S., & Schubert, T. (2019). Endogenous control of task-order preparation in variable dual tasks. Psychological research, 1-19.

Zhang, J., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2019). Affective Influence on Context-Specific Proportion Congruent (CSPC) Effect. Exp Psychol, 66(1), 86-97. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000436

Zhao, F., Gaschler, R., Schneider, L., Thomaschke, R., Rottger, E., & Haider, H. (2019). Sequence Knowledge on When and What Supports Dual-Tasking. J Cogn, 2(1), 18. doi:10.5334/joc.76 


*2018*

Aufschnaiter, S., Kiesel, A., Dreisbach, G., Wenke, D., & Thomaschke, R. (2018). Time-based expectancy in temporally structured task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 856-870. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000494

Aufschnaiter, S., Kiesel, A., & Thomaschke, R. (2018). Transfer of time-based task expectancy across different timing environments. Psychological Research, 81(1), 230-243. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0895-1

Bock, O., Drescher, U., van Winsum, W., Kesnerus, T. F., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2018). A Virtual-Reality Approach for the Assessment and Rehabilitation of Multitasking Deficits. International Journal of Virtual and Augmented Reality (IJVAR), 2(1), 48–58.

Bock, O., Drescher, U., Janouch, C., Haeger, M., van Winsum, W., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2018). An experimental paradigm for the assessment of realistic human multitasking. Virtual Reality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0342-7

Bröker, L., Liepelt, R., Poljac, E., Künzell, S., Ewolds, H., de Oliveira, R. F., & Raab, M. (2018). Multitasking as a choice problem. Psychological Research, 81(1),12-23. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0938-7

Brüning, J., & Manzey, D. (2018). Flexibility of individual multitasking strategies in task-switching with preview: Are preferences for serial versus overlapping task processing dependent on between-task conflict? Psychological Research, 81(1), 92-108. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0924-0

Dreisbach, G., & Fröber, K. (2018). On How to Be Flexible (or Not): Modulation of the Stability-Flexibility Balance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 096372141880003. doi:10.1177/0963721418800030

Fintor, E., Poljac, E., Stephan, N. D., & Koch, I. (2018). Modality compatibility biases voluntary choice of response modality in task switching. Psychological Research, (Advanced online publication) doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1040-5

Fintor, E., Stephan, N. D., & Koch, I. (2018). The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (Advanced online publication) doi: 10.1177/1747021818771836

Fintor, E., Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2018). Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: Modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality. Psychological Research, 82, 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0875-5.

Fischer R., Fröber, K. & Dreisbach, G. (2018). Shielding and relaxation in multitasking: Prospect of reward counteracts relaxation of task shielding in multitasking. Acta Psychologica, 191, 112-123.

Franke, K., Bublak, P., Hoyer, D., Billiet, T., Gaser, C., Witte, O., & Schwab, M. (2018). In vivo biomarkers of structural and functional brain development and aging in humans. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.002

Fröber, K., Raith, L., & Dreisbach, G. (2018). The dynamic balance between cognitive flexibility and stability: The influence of local changes in reward expectation and global task context on voluntary switch rate. Psychological Research, 82(1), 65-77. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0922-2

Gaschler, R., Kemper, M., Zhao, F., Pumpe, I., Ruderisch, C.-B., Röttger, E., & Haider, H. (2018). Differential effects of cue-based and sequence knowledge-based predictability on multitasking performance. Acta Psychologica, 191, 76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.004

Göhringer, F., Löhr-Limpens, M., & Schenk, T. (2018). The visual guidance of action is not insulated from cognitive interference: A multitasking study on obstacle-avoidance and bisection. Consciousness and Cognition, 64, 72-83. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.007

Haeger, M., Bock, O., Memmert, D., & Hüttermann, S. (2018). Can driving-simulator training enhance visual attention, cognition, and physical functioning in older adults? Journal of Aging Research, Article ID 7547631.

Janouch, C., Drescher, U., Wechsler, K., Haeger, M., Bock, O., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2018). Distracted Street Crossing – Cognitive-Motor Interference in an Ecologically Valid Scenario. In K. Zentgraf, H. Mueller, & E. Hazeltine (Eds.), Cognitive-Motor Interference in Multi-Tasking Research.

Janouch, C., Bock, O., Drescher, U., Wechsler, K., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2018). Cognitive-motor interference in an ecologically valid street crossing scenario. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 602.

Jurczyk, V., Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2018). Increasing reward prospect motivates switching to the more difficult task. Motivation Science. doi:10.1037/mot0000119

Klingner, C. M., Brodoehl, S., Funck, L, Klingner, C. C., Berrouschot, J., Witte, O. W., & Günther, A. (2018). Transfer of patients in a telestroke network: What are the relevant factors for making this decision? Telemedicine and e-Health. doi:10.1089/tmj.2017.0087.

Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H. & Kiesel., A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychol Bull, 144(6), 557-583. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000144

Kunde, W., Wirth, R., & Janczyk, M. (2018). The role of feedback delay in dual task performance. Psychological Research, 81(1), 157-166. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0874-6

Kübler, S., Reimer, C. B., Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2018). The impact of free-order and sequential-order instructions on task-order regulation in dual tasks. Psychological Research, 81(1), 40-53. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0910-6

Künstler, E. C. S., Finke, K., Günther, A., Klingner, C., Witte, O. W., & Bublak, P. (2018). Motor-cognitive dual-task performance: Effects of a concurrent motor task on distinct components of visual processing capacity. Psychological Research, 81(1), 177-185. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0951-x

Künzell, S., Bröker, L., Dignath, D., Ewolds, H., Raab, M., & Thomaschke, R. (2018). What is a task? An ideomotor perspective. Psychological Research, 81(1), 4-11. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0942-y

Langhanns, C. & Müller, H. (2018). Empirical support for ‘hastening-through-re-automatization’ by contrasting two motor-cognitive dual tasks. Frontiers in Psychology. doi 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00714

Langhanns, C., & Müller, H. (2018). Trying 'not to move' increases cognitive load and is potentially detrimental to concurrent cognitive performance. Psychological Research, 81(1), 167-176. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0928-9

Luna-Rodriguez, A., Wendt, M., Koerner, J., Gawrilow, K., & Jacobsen, T. (2018). Selective impairment of attentional set shifting in adults with ADHD. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 14:18. Doi: 10.1186/s12993-018-0150-y

Lüder, B., Kiss, R., & Granacher, U. (2018). Single-and Dual-Task Balance Training Are Equally Effective in Youth. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 912.

Mittelstädt, V., Dignath, D., Schmidt-Ott, M., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching. Psychological Research, 81(1), 78-91. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0911-5

Mittelstädt, V., Miller, J., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment. Memory & Cognition, 46, 699-715.

Poljac, E., Haartsen, R., van der Cruijsen, R., Kiesel, A., & Poljac, E. (2018). Task intentions and their implementation into actions: Cognitive control from adolescence to middle adulthood. Psychological Research, 81(1), 215-229. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0927-x

Poljac, E., Kiesel, A., Koch, I., & Müller, H., (2018). New perspectives on human multitasking. Editorial. Psychological Research, 82(1), 1-3. doi.org/10.1007/s0042

Schubert, T., & Strobach, T. (2018). Practice-related optimization of dual-task performance: Efficient task instantiation during overlapping task processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(12), 1884.

Schuch, S., Dignath, D., Steinhauser, M., & Janczyk, M. (2018). Monitoring and Control in Multitasking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,  Online First. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1512-z

Schroeder, P. A., Dignath, D., & Janczyk, M. (2018). Individual Differences in Uncertainty Tolerance Are not Associated With Cognitive Control Functions in the Flanker Task. Exp Psychol, 65(4), 245-256. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000408

Schuch, S., Sommer, A., & Lukas, S. (2018). Action control in task switching: Do action effects modulate N-2 repetition costs in task switching? Psychological Research, 81(1), 146-156. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0946-7

Schween, R., Taylor, J. A., & Hegele, M. (2018). Plan-based generalization shapes local implicit adaptation to opposing visuomotor transformations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 120, 2755-2787.

Sommer, A. & Lukas, S. (2018). Action-effect associations in voluntary and cued task-switching. Front. Psychol. 8:2233. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02233

Steinhauser, R., Wirth, R., Kunde, W., Janczyk, M., & Steinhauser, M. (2018). Common mechanisms in error monitoring and action effect monitoring. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 18(6), 1159-1171. doi:10.3758/s13415-018-0628-y

Stelzel, C., Bohle, H., Schauenburg, G., Walter, H., Granacher, U., Rapp, M. A., & Heinzel, S. (2018). Contribution of the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex to Cognitive-Postural Multitasking. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1075.

Stephan, N. D., Hensen, S., Fintor, E., Krampe, R., & Koch, I. (2018). Influences of postural control on cognitive control in task switching. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01153

Strobach, T., Antonenko, D., Abbarin, M., Escher, M., Floel, A., & Schubert, T. (2018). Modulation of dual-task control with right prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Exp Brain Res, 236(1), 227-241. doi:10.1007/s00221-017-5121-2

Strobach, T., Hendrich, E., Kübler, S., Müller, H., & Schubert, T. (2018). Processing order in dual-task situations: The “first-come, first-served” principle and the impact of task order instructions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(7), 1785-1803.

Wechsler, K., Drescher, U., Janouch, C., Haeger, M., Voelcker-Rehage, C., & Bock, O. (2018). Multitasking while car driving in young and in older persons. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 910.

Wendt, M., Luna-Rodriguez, A., & Jacobsen, T. (2018). Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.Psychological Research, 81(1), 134-145 doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0890-6

Wirth, R., Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2018). Effect monitoring in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(4), 553-571.

Wirth, R., Steinhauser, R., Janczyk, M., Steinhauser, M., & Kunde, W. (2018). Long-term and short-term action-effect links and their impact on effect monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 44(8), 1186-119.

Zhao, F., Gaschler, R., Travi, T., Imgrund, B., Kossak, V., Röttger, E., & Haider, H. (2018). Effects of overlap between consecutive words on speeded typing inform about representation of serial order within words. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 14, 124-136. doi: 10.5709/acp-0244-6 [PDF: http://ac-psych.org/en/issues/volume/14/issue/3]
 

*2017*

Broeker, L., Kiesel, A., Aufschnaiter, S., Ewolds, H., Gaschler, R., Haider, H., Künzell, S., Raab, M., Röttger, E., Thomaschke, R. & Zhao, F. (2017). Why prediction matters in multitasking and how predictability can improve it. Frontiers in psychology, 8: 2021. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02021.

Dalecki, M., Kalicinski, M., Steinberg, F., Bock, O. (2017) Age-related operator deficits in a realistic instrument-control task: assessment of possible motor, cognitive and mental causes. Int J Industrial Ergonomics, 59, 100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2017.03.003.

de Oliveira, R., Raab, M., Hegele, M., & Schorer, J. (2017). Multi-task integration facilitates implicit motor learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00398.

Dignath, D., Janczyk, M., & Eder, A. B. (2017). Phasic valence and arousal do not influence post-conflict adjustments in the Simon task. Acta Psychologica, 174, 31-39. doi: http://10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.01.004.

Ewolds, H. E., Bröker, L., Oliveira, R. F. de, Raab, M., & Künzell, S. (2017). Implicit and Explicit Knowledge Both Improve Dual Task Performance in a Continuous Pursuit Tracking Task. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:2241. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02241.

Fintor, E., Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2017). Emerging features of modality mapping in task switching: Modality compatibility requires variability at the level of stimulus and response modality. Psychological Research (online first), 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0875-5.

Fröber, K. & Dreisbach, G. (2017). Keep flexible - Keep switching! The influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching. Cognition, 162, 48-53. doi: 1016/j.cognition.2017.01.024.

Fröber, K.,  Raith, L., & Dreisbach, G (2017). The dynamic balance between cognitive flexibility and stability: The influence of local changes in reward expectation and global task context on voluntary switch rate. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0922-2.

Giannouli, E., Bock, O., Zijlstra, W.  (2017). Cognitive functioning is more closely related to real-life mobility than to laboratory based mobility parameters. Eur J Ageing 1-9.

Godde, B. & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2017). Cognitive resources necessary for motor control in older adults are reduced by walking and coordination training. Frontiers Human Neuroscience, 11:156. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00156.

Goetz, T., Hanke, D., Huonker, R., Weiss, T., Klingner, C., Brodoehl, S., Baumbach, P, & Witte, O. W. (2017). The influence of eye closure on somatosensory discrimination: A trade-off between simple perception and discrimination. Cerebral Cortex, 27(6), 3231–3239. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx089.

Heinzel, S, Rimpel, J, Stelzel, C., Rapp, M.A. (2017). Transfer effects to a multimodal dual-task after working memory training and associated neural correlates in older adults. Front Human Neurosciience, 11, 85. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00085.

Heinzel, S., Lorenz, R. C., Duong, Q.-L., Rapp, M. A., & Deserno, L. (2017). Prefrontal-parietal effective connectivity during working memory in older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 57, 18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.05.005.

Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2017). Effort in Multitasking: Local and global assessment of effort. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00111.

Klingner, C. M., Herdtle, S., Brodoehl, S., Hohenstein, C., Wild, T., Behringer, W., Witte, O. W., & Günther, A. (2017). Eine retrospektive Beobachtungsstudie bei Patienten mit akutem ischämischem Hirninfarkt. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin, 20, 509 – 514.

Koranyi, N., Meinhard, M., Bublak, P., Witte, O. W., & Rupprecht, S. (2017). Automatic affective responses towards the bed in patients with primary insomnia: evidence for a negativity bias. Journal of Sleep Research, doi: 10.1111/jsr.12591.

Kübler, S., Reimer, C.  B., Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2017). The impact of free-order and sequential-order instructions on task-order regulation in dual tasks. Psychological Research. doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0910-6.

Kübler, S., & Schubert, T. (2017). Disrupting cognitive control in dual-task situations by transcranial magne-tic stimulation of the lateral prefrontal cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology, 128(3), 119. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.334.

Künzell, S., Sießmeir, D., & Ewolds, H. (2017). Validation of the Continuous Tracking Paradigm for Studying Implicit Motor Learning. Experimental Psychology, 63(6), 318–325. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000343.

Langhanns, C. & Müller, H. (2017). Effects of trying ‘not to move’ instruction on cortical load and concurrent cognitive performance. Psychological Research. doi 10.1007/s00426-017-0928-9.

Lindemann, H., Panzer, S., & Shea, C.H. (2017). The learning of a multi-element movement sequence under dual-task conditions. In C. Augste, & S. Künzell (Eds.) Cogito ergo commoveo - Multitasking im Sport (pp. 106-108). Hamburg: Feldhaus.

Plessow, F. & Fischer, R. (2017). Multitasking. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T.K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, Springer International Publishing, 1-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_985-1.

Schubert, T., Liepelt, R., Kübler, S., & Strobach, T. (2017). Transferability of Dual-Task Coordination Skills after Practice with Changing Component Tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:956. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00956.

Schuch, S., & Pütz, S. (2017). Mood state dissociates conflict adaptation within tasks and across tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Online First.

Schuch, S., Sommer, A., & Lukas, S. (2017). Action control in task switching: Do action effects modulate N-2 repetition costs in task switching? Psychological Research, Online First.

Schuch, S., & Konrad, K. (2017). Investigating task inhibition in children versus adults: A diffusion model analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 143-167. doi: org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.012 (audio-files).

Schween, R., & Hegele, M. (2017). Feedback delay modulates implicit and explicit visuomotor adaptation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 140, 124-133.

Steinhauser, M., Ernst, B., & Ibald, K. (2017). Isolating component processes of post-error slowing with the PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 43, 653-659. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000329.

Stelzel, C.*,  Schauenburg, G.*, Rapp, M.A.,  Heinzel, S., Granacher, U. (2017). Age-Related Interference between the selection of input-output modality mappings and postural control - a pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:613. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00613. *equal contribution.

Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2017). Mechanisms of Practice-Related Reductions of Dual-Task Interference with Simple Tasks: Data and Theory. Adv Cogn Psychol., 13(1), 28–41. doi: 10.5709/acp-0204-7.

Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2017). No evidence for task automatization after dual-task training in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 32(1), 28-41. doi: 10.1037/pag0000144.

Wang, C., Kennedy, D., Panzer, S., & Shea, C.H. (2017). Intentional switching between bimanual coordination patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2017.1375453.

Wendt, M., Kähler, S. T., Luna-Rodriguez, A., & Jacobsen, T. (2017). Adoption of task-specific sets of visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:687. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00687.

Wendt, M., Klein, S., & Strobach, T. (2017). More than attentional tuning—investigating the mechanisms underlying practice gains and preparation in task switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00682.
 

*2016*

Abram, K., Bohne, S., Bublak, P., Karvouniari, P., Klingner, C. M., Witte, O. W., Guntinas-Lichius, O., & Axer, H. (2016). The effect of spinal tap test on different sensory modalities of postural stability in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 6, 447 – 457. doi: 10.1159/000450602.

Bock, O., Brustio, P.R., Borisova, S. (2016). Age differences of gaze distribution during pedestrian walking in a virtual-reality environment.  Int J Appl Psychol 6:64-69. doi: 10.5923/j.ijap.20160603.03.

Bock, O., Akpinar, S. (2016) Performance of older persons in a simulated shopping task is influenced by priming with age stereotypes. PLoS ONE 11:e0160739.

Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2016). How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(2), 285-295. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000166.

Giannouli, E., Bock, O., Mellone, S., & Zijlstra, W. (2016). Mobility in old age: capacity is not performance. BioMed Research International. doi: 10.1155/2016/3261567.

Heinzel, S., Lorenz, R. C., Pelz, P., Heinz, A., Walter, H., Kathmann, N., Rapp, M.A*., Stelzel, C*. (2016). Neural correlates of training and transfer effects in working memory in older adults. NeuroImage, 134, 236-249. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.068  *equal contribution.

Klingner, C. M., Axer, H. Brodoehl, S., & Witte, O. W. (2016). Vertigo and the processing of vestibular information: A review in the context of predictive coding. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 379 – 387. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.009.

Klingner, C. M., Brodoehl, S., Huonker, R., & Witte, O. W. (2016). The processing of somatosensory information shifts from an early parallel into a serial processing mode: A combined fMRI/MEG study. Frontiers in System Neuroscience, 10:103. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00103.

Panzer, S., Lindemann, H. & Shea, C.H. (2016). Effects of single-task practice of dual-task performance limitations in sequence learning. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 39, 170.

Reimer, C. B., Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2016). Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 1- 18. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1245348.

Reissland, J. & Manzey, D. (2016). Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance. Acta Psychologica, 168, 27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.010.

Schuch, S. (2016). Task Inhibition and Response Inhibition in Older versus Younger Adults: A Diffusion Model Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01722.

Wollesen, B., Voelcker-Rehage, C., Regenbrecht, T. & Mattes, K. (2016). Influence of a visual-verbal stroop test on standing and walking performance of older adults-an experimental study based on a literature review. Neuroscience, 318, 166-177. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.01.031.

 

 

Find us on Wikipedia here.

Benutzerspezifische Werkzeuge